About Me

Name: Brian Koenig
Email: brianekoenig84@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Political Correctness is Killing America

How dare you say “Merry Christmas” during the Christmas season. Saying “Merry Christmas” is no longer an acceptable way to share your holiday cheer; but fear not, there are plenty of appropriate phrases that have been deemed acceptable by the liberal Language Police. “Joyous Agnostic Greetings”, “Merry Muslim Day”, and “Happy Christwanzakka” are just a few of the MANY holiday expressions you may scribe into your holiday handbook. Every December, the “Merry Christmas” diversity debacle ASCENDS to the surface and Americans must decide whether they are going to be on the Politically Correct or Politically Incorrect side of the playing field. 

Bill Clinton loves getting blown by brunette interns. WHOA, WHOA, WHOA, that is absurd! How dare you accuse him in such heinous and despicable means. He enjoys receiving welcoming stimulation resulting in a sudden INCREASE in contentment. (Doesn’t sound so bad does it?) That may seem pretty extreme, but this is how liberals would like us to communicate. They want us to mask our speech and language with metaphorical NONSENSE so that nobody’s feelings get hurt. When in favor of loony liberals, the 1st Amendment need not apply.

A  WARNING to all movie directors and screenwriters. When creating your moving picture masterpiece remember two very important things. Before developing the content or writing the script, decide what culturally diverse characters you will implement and make sure you REFRAIN from using axiomatic stereotypes.  In action films, the “bad guys” must only be of Caucasian descent and if there is cigarette smoking those characters must only be “bad guys”. Next, If your film has a scene that is based in an office setting, you must have an equal ratio of male-to-female secretarial staff. Having only female secretaries and administrative assistants might expose you to a few face slaps from the repugnant women at the Feminist Majority Foundation. Now there is one exception to the stereotype rule. Feel free to use homosexuals in supporting roles or as secondary characters, because believe it or not, they prefer activity in the rear. (Hehe, my attempt at being P.C.) 

Novelists, journalists, plagiarists, BEWARE! Groups such as “Women for Male Castration” and “Females against Deodorant” are going to strip you of your God given ability to pen your paper, unless of course you adhere to stringent regulations. Forget about using “he”, “him”, or “his” ever again, unless of course you throw in a “she” or “her” afterwards. Any other use of sex-related pronouns would be considered obtrusive and chauvinistic. It doesn’t matter if you are writing about Abe Lincoln. Doesn’t this sound way less sexist?  “He or she brought African Americans out of slavery”. Why should you use neutral language? Because even though it was Abe that abolished slavery, it very well could have been Abel, especially if white women didn’t have to endure decades of slavery as well (as those gangly feminists see it).

Liberals are fine with jamming scissors into babies’ skulls and then sucking their brains out with a vacuum. HERESY! We are Pro-Choice, not Pro-Abortion. I mean come on, no one is actually FOR abortion. Now, THAT is heresy. If I was okay with someone jamming scissors into your microscopic liberal brain, would you be hesitant to say that I am Pro-DEATH? (Hmm, maybe I’m not Pro-Life.) Liberals’ excuse for supporting baby genocide is that they are protecting women’s “rights”. Man, I wonder if I injected a poisonous solution into Margaret Sanger’s (founder of Planned Parenthood) stomach, I would be exonerated for protecting the “rights” of Republicans.

You know, I better retract my statement that Political Correctness is Killing America….Political Correctness is nullifying America’s future viability.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberalism is a Waste

Let’s raise taxes so we can better this country. Well Mr. Flaming Liberal, your government and its inefficient spending, is going to make it very difficult to make much of a difference. Welfare is the perfect example.  Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" programs were supposed to stamp out poverty in the U.S. Well, In 2001, 35 years later, the poverty rate is at the same level.  Wow, what a SUCCESSFUL program! The problem is, there is no oversight over government spending, particularly with these social programs. The underclass has been desensitized to believe that welfare is their "right”, and these welfare checks are being thrown at them without questions being asked.  Oh, and the busiest time for LIQUOR SALES & DOPE DEALING is when the welfare checks come in. I am glad our tax dollars are providing for such a great cause. I am not going to agree that it’s right for the Government to TAKE & WASTE more of our hard worked dollars. Sorry, I guess that makes me an INSENSITIVE jerk.

There is no accountability for this kind of spending, and you can't count on the GAO. The only time they step in is when there is fraudulent activity, and they hardly ever audit federal expenditures. There is no government agency that actually watches this money! If the government was EFFECTIVELY using our tax dollars to alleviate suffering & protect our families, I'd shut up, but there are trillions of dollars that are just floating around without supervision. Now, there are the congressmen, but they allotted the money in the first place, and they don't want the people to know that they are wasting this disgusting amount of their money.

Our wonderful government takes 46 cents on the gallon of our gasoline and they take 58% of hard liquor sales. Oh, and would you like to heat your house? The Feds are going to nail you for 25 cents on the gallon for heating oil. Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, you want more money from us? Then stop FREAKING wasting it!

There needs to be a department that is solely dedicated to watching how our money is being spent. The problem is, the government doesn’t want us to know this. That would just take away too much of their power. OK, time for EXAMPLES: Hillary, Chelsea, & her entourage went on a 2 week jaunt to N. Africa. Of course, the Secret Service Expenses are not available to us, but it is estimated that the trip cost somewhere around 2.3 million dollars. Not too sure how this is possible but this is what David Walker of the GAO claims. Ain’t that some BULL.

During the Clinton Admin., 3 billion dollars went to Haiti and only 2 billion was accounted for. No one seems to know where the other billion went. Oh DAMN, I’ve looked in my wallet 3 times and I still can’t find that $20 bill I thought I had. Hmmm, I guess that’s not really comparing apples to apples. In the 8 years spent in the White House, Bill & Hillary spent $525 million of TAXPAYERS’ dollars for travel expenses. In Bill’s first 5 months out of office he visited 2 dozen countries and picked up $5 million in speaking fees. It sure can pay off to become president of the U.S. By the way, these are all rough estimates because we, as American citizens are not allowed to know where our hard earned MONEY is going. We have to work 3 out of the 8 hours in our work day to pay federal taxes, and I don’t know about you, but with “VOLUNTEERING” 3 hours every day, shouldn’t we be able to know where our “donations” are going to, or is this just a heretic question to ask?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Ironic Lung

Smokers are killing my dog! Smokers are killing my cat! The government does a great job at figuring out great ways to rape their citizens by taxing them in new and innovative ways. The alcohol and cigarette "sin" taxes have been around for quite a while and now the govt. would like to raise the cigarette tax astronomically higher in order to help fund healthcare.

First of all, do not be naive to think that the reason the government taxes cigarettes is because they are trying to protect the commonwealth of their citizens. If so, they would make cigarette smoking illegal altogether. This is not a moral action by Congressional beauracrats. It is all about the GREEN (money, not pollution). The government LOVES smokers because they receive BUNDLES of tax revenue from them. They could care less if there are hundreds of smokers dying everyday of lung cancer, because those "martyrs" are funding the government's desire for socialized welfare, ahem, I mean healthcare.

Getting smokers to stop smoking is not their goal. Their goal from raising cigarette tax is more tax revenue! I would be less critical if the government would outlaw smoking alltogether because I would atleast know that the government is not being a self-righteous, money hungry, hitleresque machine.

So, cigarette tax revenue going towards healthcare. The common (ignorant) citizen looks at this idea as, "oh, well the government is going to take moral action by taking money from a bad cause (smoking) and putting it towards a good cause (healthcare)." First, don't ever allow the government to convince you that they are taking moral action. (Roe vs. Wade, DUH!) Here are some questions for all of you people who do not understand political economics. What happens when you tax smokers so much that they cannot afford to smoke anymore? They start quitting and the decrease in sales revenue begins to offset the tax revenue. UH OH! It backfired, now we have less tax revenue. That money was supposed to go towards healthcare! DOUBLE UH OH! Now you dumbfounded people ask, "well where is that healthcare money going to come from now?"

The answer......................YOU.

Moral of the story. More smokers, more money for you. Less smokers, less money for you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »