About Me

Name: Brian Koenig
Email: brianekoenig84@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Terrorism on the Right

An unclassified report released by the Department of Homeland Security is labeling 'right-wring extremists', concerned with increased government control, illegal immigration, abortion, and other conservative opposition, as potentialities for violence and terrorism. 
 
The report defines right-wing extremists as "those that are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely."  The report goes on to say that many right-wing extremists 's are focused on exclusive issues, such as illegal immigration and abortion.
 
Causes of such violence and terrorism are said to be brought on by prolonged economic downturn, including unemployment rates, real estate foreclosures, and bank loans.  The fear of further restriction, or possibly a ban, on firearms is also a concern that is addressed within the report.
 
I believe this report to be political, left-wing propaghanda that is being used to squelch future opposition of Obama's newly formed marxist regime.  The Administration is believed by the right to hold an extremist agenda, and declaring free market junkies as crazy domestic terrorists may bring a negative label on various groups and protests, such as the organized "tea parties".
 
Remember McCarthy?  The free market elephants have replaced the communist "reds" on the blacklist, with Rush and Coulter replacing the Rosenbergs. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bureaucracy and Bailouts

Along with government bailouts of the American auto industry comes a preconceived notion that foreign competitors are the leading factor in our auto companies' collapse.  May it be true that Japan has become a dominant force in the marketplace, American policies and regulations have exceedingly contributed to the "Big Three's" demise.
 
Government intervention into the global economy and the abolishment of free trade has had a devastating effect on the importation and exportation of American goods.  With the intent of preventing inflation and the outsourcing of jobs, the government has artificially manipulated foreign trade.  Raising tariffs and increasing regulation discourages the positive effects of American trade. 
 
Many see workers' unions as a preeminant force in establishing "job security" and maintaining competitive wages and benefits.  This is yet another archetype of the selfishness and ignorance of the American people. 
 
The UAW (United Auto Workers) has prodigiously affected the viability of GM, Ford, and Chrysler.  The average expense per employee for auto union workers, consisting of the "Big Three", is $130,000, whereas the average expense for nonunion employees, consisting of the foreign auto companies, is only $80,000. 
 
If it costs Honda 40% less to pay their employees, don't you think it will have an exorbitant effect on the success of their company?  This is not about greedy CEO's, but the success of American companies.  Why?  Because the more successful our corporations are, the better our economy, and the better our economy, the better our unemployment rates.  Which is preferable, being in a union that is crippling your company, forcing you into unemployment, or being a non-union worker yet retaining your job?
 
Lastly, is the overwhelming restraint imposed by the United States government to regulate and restrict American auto companies.  In 2007, Congress passed new Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards (CAFE) which costed the U.S. auto industry $110 billion in research, manufacturing, and production costs.  Experts predict that when everything is said and done, consumers will pay an average of $5000-$6000 more per vehicle.
 
The process of producing the corn in ethanol is a supreme example of wasteful research bestowed on private enterprise.  This brilliant idea that intended to "save the world" ended up being a massive failure.  It consumed energy to cultivate and grow the corn, it consumed energy to transport the corn, and guess what, it consumed energy then to produce ethanol.  Billions of dollars flushed down the toilet.
 
This example of government imposition creates inefficient research and development, inflates manufacturing costs, and initiates production complusion.  Along with such coercion, the government has destroyed the SUV and truck market by skyrocketing the price of oil, which again is a result of government regulation and restrictions.
 
The free market is the only answer for the revival of the Big Three.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Taxation without Respresentation

The ignorance bestowed upon liberals is the result of a combination of bureacratic language and media-bias.  The devastating effect of this surface-based thinking is a mindset not of economic truth, but of emotional falsity.
 
The danger of such emotional thought has created an administration that seeks to form a centralized government, a government that will have a calamitous effect on our already failing economy.
 
The phrase, "we need to raise taxes on the 'rich' in order for everyone to have their 'fair share'" is one of the benighted phrases liberals use when referring to income taxation.  This surfaced-based mindset is based solely on emotional feeling and completely IGNORES the economic implications of such taxation.
 
Let me explain a simple reaction that results from media spin and bureacratic diction.  MSNBC does a story on a poor broken-home family that is struggling to make ends meet.  Barack Obama says we need "change" and Chris Mathews says we need to redistribute the wealth.  In response, the viewer impetuously approves of progressive taxation without conducting any of their own investigative groundwork.
 
There are two different ways to view the upper class, emotionally and economically.  The emotional evaluation is equivalent to the MSNBC dissolution.  A tv-watching fool gets his feathers ruffled and begins to look at the wealthy as greedy, undeserving people who are in need of COERCED dispensation.  This is the mindset that the American people receive when they are too uninitiated to think for themselves.
 
Analyzing the upper class with an economic viewpoint, which would result from overstepping the inherently liberal response, would be to see the "rich" as investors, rather than greedy monsters.  Some may be greedy monsters, but is it worth it to punish them at the expense of national growth and economic prosperity?
 
Statistical analysis shows that when you tax the "rich", you are taxing the investors of small businesses, aka the venture capitalists.  Slapping VC's with outrageous tax increases ENCOURAGES them to bury their money into tax-sheltered funds and discourages the infusion of their money into the heart of our economy.   
 
A lesson for the ignorant.  The American people need to try to be less stupid.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Destruction of Both Parties

At the end of Obama's term, the conventional classification of the Republican and Democratic parties will no longer hold true to their original meanings.  The Republican's will return to their conservative roots and the Democrat's will become a party that is attributed with principles as described by Karl Marx.  The result will be a Neo-Marxist party versus a Conservative Free Market party.
 
If Obama continues his policies of mass spending and government control, our country will undergo transformation from a Democratic form of government, into a socialist form of government.  Obama is undeniably a socialist.  The combination of mass spending, with increased taxation, and total control over the private industry, will dissolve the free market.
 
The Framers ("Founding Fathers is sexist), founded America as a Republic.  A Republic administers justice through fixed principles and established evidence that results in liberty, justice, contentment, and progress--Hard work is rewarded with progress.
 
Somewhere along the line we transformed into a Democracy.  A Democracy is a government of the masses that results in mobocracy.  The attitude of the democracy negates property rights and the will of the majority regulates without regard to consequence.
 
230 years later, we have taken the next step--Socialism.  Socialism is a form of government that advocates public and state ownership of the production and distribution of goods. 
 
Obama's plan will revolutionize private industry and our market economy will be renewed with a command economy, which in turn will destroy the free market.  The Democratics will fall and the Marxists will rise.  This is my prediction.
 
"And to the Republic for which it Falls".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »